Link copied to clipboard!
All Insights
Asana vs Microsoft Planner (PH enterprise reality check)
Written by
Published on
February 20, 2025

If you’re a small, single-team Microsoft 365 shop, Planner can be perfectly fine for basic boards and tasks. The moment you need cross-team visibility, governed templates, intake → approvals, and automation at scale, Asana typically delivers faster time-to-value with less glue work.

1) Scorecard for PH enterprises

Use this quick scorecard to align on what matters before you debate features.

Area What matters in practice Planner (baseline) Asana (baseline)
Governance & security Clear ownership, access patterns, auditability Works for small teams; deeper controls often require extra config Org/teams/projects model, robust roles, templates, naming/fields governance
Cross-team visibility Roll-ups/leaders’ view without manual slides Limited roll-ups; relies on additional tools Portfolios, dashboards, workload across projects
Workflow automation Rules, escalations, approvals, webhooks Light; extended via Power Automate Rich rules, approvals, forms→fields routing; webhook/integration friendly
Intake & approvals Forms that route to the right board with SLAs Basic forms pattern via Microsoft ecosystem Native forms mapped to fields, auto-routing, approval gates
Reporting On-time rate, blockers, cycle time Basic charts; advanced needs Power BI Configurable dashboards & portfolio widgets
Scale & change mgmt Templates, taxonomy, champions program Works per team/board Designed for cross-team standardization & templates

Reality check: You can make Planner do more with Power Automate/BI—just budget the build/maintain effort. Asana aims to make those same outcomes available with less custom work.

2) When Planner is “good enough”

Stay on Planner if most of the following are true:

  • One or two small teams; low dependency work
  • Tasks don’t require approvals or SLAs
  • Reporting needs are light and fine in basic charts
  • You already invested in Power Automate/Power BI flows and they’re stable
  • No near-term requirement for governed templates or multi-team portfolio views

3) Where Asana wins at scale

Choose Asana when at least two of these matter:

  • Governed templates and fields taxonomy across departments
  • Intake → triage → approvals with SLAs and routings
  • Rules for escalations, handoffs, and due-date math—without building flows from scratch
  • Portfolio reporting leaders review weekly (on-time rate, blockers, cycle time)
  • Admin controls that support guest access, de-provisioning, and change management

Example at a glance:

  • A Client Onboarding template with an intake form that maps to custom fields (Client Tier, SLA, Risk).
  • Rules auto-assign the right owner, set due dates from priority, and escalate P1 tasks.
  • A Portfolio shows on-time completion and top blockers—no slides needed.

4) Migration notes (Planner → Asana)

Keep the first migration small and defensible:

  1. Pick two pilot workflows (e.g., Client Onboarding and Marketing Sprint).
  2. Field mapping: decide the minimal fields you need (Status, Priority, Department, SLA, Risk).
  3. Freeze changes on the legacy boards for pilot scope to avoid drift.
  4. Train with your data: short hands-on sessions for managers and doers.
  5. Validate dashboards with leadership before expanding to more teams.

5) ROI snapshot (simple math you can defend)

If 40 users save 25 minutes/day via rules, intake routing, and portfolio visibility → ~16.7 hours/day.

At a blended ₱800/hour, that’s ₱13,360/day → ~₱2.7M/year (200 working days).

Add “meetings removed” (status updates replaced by dashboards) for extra gain.

6) Decision-matrix workbook (free)

To make this objective, score your requirements with weights:

Download: Decision Matrix — Asana vs Planner (xlsx)

Edit the weights (0–1) and scores (1–5) per criterion.

The sheet calculates totals and surfaces trade-offs transparently.

7) Next steps

Not sure yet? Book a 15-min discovery and we’ll apply the matrix to your environment.

Ready to pilot? Start with two workflows and the governance starter from our Asana Playbook.

FAQs

Is Microsoft Planner enough for cross-department projects?

Often not. It’s fine for small, low-dependency work. Once you need approvals, SLAs, and cross-team roll-ups, you’ll likely add flows/BI—or move to a tool designed for scale.

What does Asana offer that Planner doesn’t?

Out-of-the-box strengths for multi-team scale: governed templates, richer rules, forms → fields routing, approvals, and portfolio dashboards leaders actually review.

How hard is it to migrate from Planner to Asana?

Keep it simple: two pilot workflows, minimal fields, freeze legacy boards, train with your data, and validate dashboards with leadership before expanding.

Share this post